Growth audit
Everlane
everlane.com
Run 2 August 2026, today
What we measured
Four separate checks. There is no single overall score, because these measure different things and averaging them would hide which one needs work.
- Agent readability
- 65/100
- Tracking hygiene
- 62/100
- Landing page
- 83/100
- AI visibility
- 32/100
The headline
85 of your 1000 product listings cannot be bought in any size or variant, yet they remain published and crawlable. This can lead to customer frustration and missed sales opportunities.
What is costing you right now
- 85 of your 1000 product listings are still in your sitemap and public product feed, so an assistant asked for a recommendation has a 9% chance of naming one that cannot be bought.
- Your AI visibility score is 32/100, with Everlane mentioned in only 3 of 12 answers across chatgpt, claude, and gemini. Competitors like Uniqlo and J.Crew are recommended more frequently, which could divert potential customers away from your brand.
Fix this week
- Review and remove or update the 85 dead listings to ensure they are not visible to customers or AI shopping agents, preventing potential frustration and improving user experience.
How AI assistants see you
Checked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 12 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
Everlane was mentioned in 3 out of 12 scored answers across chatgpt, claude, and gemini. Competitors such as Uniqlo and J.Crew were recommended more frequently, indicating a need to improve AI visibility and brand recognition in AI-generated responses.
What we could not check
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
Want this report in your inbox?
Optional. Everything above stays on screen either way, and the link below works forever.
Every check, in full
- 65/100
AI Readiness
Dex
5 of 12 schema types present, llms.txt present
- Product schema on https://everlane.com/products/mens-renew-backpack-estate-blue is incomplete: Missing fields: offers.
- No BreadcrumbList on https://everlane.com/products/mens-renew-backpack-estate-blue, so agents cannot place the product in your site hierarchy.
Paste-ready fixes (8)
BreadcrumbList schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://yoursite.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Products", "item": "https://yoursite.com/products" } ] } </script>FAQPage schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Your question here?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Your answer here." } } ] } </script>Review schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "reviewRating": { "@type": "Rating", "ratingValue": "5", "bestRating": "5" }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Customer Name" }, "reviewBody": "Review text here" } </script>AggregateRating schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Product", "name": "Product Name", "aggregateRating": { "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": "4.5", "reviewCount": "127" } } </script>LocalBusiness schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "LocalBusiness", "name": "Your Business", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "123 Main St", "addressLocality": "City", "addressRegion": "State", "postalCode": "12345" }, "telephone": "+1-555-555-5555" } </script>HowTo schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "HowTo", "name": "How to do something", "step": [ { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 1", "text": "Do this first" }, { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 2", "text": "Then do this" } ] } </script>Article schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Article Title", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Author Name" }, "datePublished": "2024-01-01", "image": "https://yoursite.com/article-image.jpg" } </script>Missing meta tags<meta property="og:image" content="https://yoursite.com/og-image.jpg" /> - 62/100
Tracking & Pixels
Dex
0 of 3 pixels visible in page source, 6 issues
This check reads static HTML only. A GTM container is present (gtm-suite). Server-side tagging signals are present (Shopify Web Pixels (sandboxed); Elevar / Stape server-side). Any pixel not listed as detected may still be firing through one of those, so we have not scored it as missing.
- Meta Pixel not visible in static HTML
- Google Ads / GA4 not visible in static HTML
- TikTok Pixel not visible in static HTML
- GTM noscript fallback missing
- No consent management detected
- No tracking pixels detected on page
Catalogue
Parker
1000 products, 8173 variants, 291 collections
Listed price range 27 to 475, median 155 (store currency)
- Prices are published in USD (${{amount}}), which is the currency an agent will quote to a shopper.
- We read 1000 of the 8685 products your store publishes, so the catalogue findings below cover that subset rather than everything you sell.
- 44 products have an empty product_type. Feed taxonomy falls back to guesswork downstream.
- 85 of 1000 product listings (9%) cannot be bought in any size or variant, yet they are still published and crawlable. An assistant that recommends one sends the shopper to a dead end.
- 264 variants have no SKU, which blocks feed-level reconciliation.
- 83/100
Landing Page
Dex
1 h1, 4 calls to action, 1 trust signals
Our screenshot service was rate limited by the CDN in front of this site, so the visual pass did not run. This is a limit on our vendor's shared addresses, not a setting on your store, and it often clears on a later run. Every HTML-level finding below is unaffected.
- 20 of 44 images have no alt text.
- 33 external scripts. Each one is a blocking third-party dependency on first paint.
- Not measured
Live Ads
Maya
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
- 32/100
AI Visibility
Maya
MeasuredChecked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 12 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
The 4 questions we asked
- “What are the best cotton shirts?”
- “Best shirts for everyday wear”
- “Which brands make lightweight shirts?”
- “Best shirts for training”
These questions were built from your own catalogue: product types, product titles, tags and your median price. None of them name your brand, so a mention means an assistant surfaced you unprompted.
Also recommended: Uniqlo, Great, Investment, Excellent, J.Crew, Exceptional
- Everlane appeared in 3 of 12 answers (25%) across 3 assistants.
- Best placement was position 2 in a ranked list.
- Also named: Uniqlo, Great, Investment, Excellent, J.Crew.
- perplexity could not be queried on this run, so it is excluded from the measurement rather than counted as a miss.
Agent Access
Dex
This report contains no revenue forecast, no spend recommendation and no dollar projection.
6 of 7 checks completed in 17.9s, served from a cached run.