Growth audit
Glossier
glossier.com
Run 31 July 2026, 1 day ago
What we measured
Four separate checks. There is no single overall score, because these measure different things and averaging them would hide which one needs work.
- Agent readability
- 68/100
- Tracking hygiene
- 68/100
- Landing page
- 84/100
- AI visibility
- 0/100
The headline
Glossier's AI visibility is currently at 0/100, with no mentions in 12 queries across chatgpt, claude, and gemini. Competitors like Diptyque and CeraVe were recommended instead.
What is costing you right now
- 127 of your 291 listings are still in your sitemap and public product feed, so an assistant asked for a recommendation has a 44% chance of naming one that cannot be bought.
- Glossier was not named in any of the 12 answers from chatgpt, claude, and gemini when asked about best colognes or face moisturizers. This limits your brand's visibility and potential sales through AI-driven recommendations.
- 16 of 114 products (14%) are missing prices in the product feed, which can lead to incomplete or inaccurate information being presented to potential buyers.
- 26 of 114 products (23%) lack descriptions, making it difficult for AI agents to differentiate your products and recommend them accurately.
Fix this week
- Ensure all product listings have complete and accurate prices and descriptions to improve AI agent parsing and recommendations.
- Review and update your product feed to remove dead listings and ensure only purchasable products are included.
How AI assistants see you
Checked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 12 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
Glossier was not mentioned in any of the 12 queries across chatgpt, claude, and gemini. Instead, brands like Diptyque, Dior Sauvage, and CeraVe were recommended. This indicates a gap in AI-driven brand visibility and suggests a need for improved digital presence and structured data.
What we could not check
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
Want this report in your inbox?
Optional. Everything above stays on screen either way, and the link below works forever.
Every check, in full
- 68/100
AI Readiness
Dex
3 of 12 schema types present, llms.txt present
- No Organization schema on your homepage, so agents have no machine-readable statement of who you are.
- No BreadcrumbList on https://glossier.com/products/full-orbit, so agents cannot place the product in your site hierarchy.
Paste-ready fixes (9)
Organization schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "Your Company Name", "url": "https://yoursite.com", "logo": "https://yoursite.com/logo.png", "sameAs": ["https://twitter.com/yourhandle", "https://linkedin.com/company/yourcompany"] } </script>WebSite schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebSite", "name": "Your Site Name", "url": "https://yoursite.com", "potentialAction": { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": "https://yoursite.com/search?q={search_term_string}", "query-input": "required name=search_term_string" } } </script>BreadcrumbList schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://yoursite.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Products", "item": "https://yoursite.com/products" } ] } </script>FAQPage schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Your question here?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Your answer here." } } ] } </script>Review schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "reviewRating": { "@type": "Rating", "ratingValue": "5", "bestRating": "5" }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Customer Name" }, "reviewBody": "Review text here" } </script>AggregateRating schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Product", "name": "Product Name", "aggregateRating": { "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": "4.5", "reviewCount": "127" } } </script>LocalBusiness schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "LocalBusiness", "name": "Your Business", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "123 Main St", "addressLocality": "City", "addressRegion": "State", "postalCode": "12345" }, "telephone": "+1-555-555-5555" } </script>HowTo schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "HowTo", "name": "How to do something", "step": [ { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 1", "text": "Do this first" }, { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 2", "text": "Then do this" } ] } </script>Article schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Article Title", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Author Name" }, "datePublished": "2024-01-01", "image": "https://yoursite.com/article-image.jpg" } </script> - 68/100
Tracking & Pixels
Dex
0 of 3 pixels visible in page source, 5 issues
This check reads static HTML only. A GTM container is present (gtm-suite). A consent platform is present (OneTrust). Server-side tagging signals are present (Shopify Web Pixels (sandboxed); Elevar / Stape server-side). Any pixel not listed as detected may still be firing through one of those, so we have not scored it as missing.
- Meta Pixel not visible in static HTML
- Google Ads / GA4 not visible in static HTML
- TikTok Pixel not visible in static HTML
- GTM noscript fallback missing
- No tracking pixels detected on page
Catalogue
Parker
114 products, 369 variants, 118 collections
Listed price range 5 to 200, median 24 (store currency)
- Prices are published in USD (${{amount}}), which is the currency an agent will quote to a shopper.
- 34 of 114 products (30%) have a description under 100 characters, against a catalogue median of 435. That is below what agent product matching needs to tell one of your SKUs from another.
- 1 of 114 product listings (1%) cannot be bought in any size or variant, yet they are still published and crawlable. An assistant that recommends one sends the shopper to a dead end.
- 30 variants have no SKU, which blocks feed-level reconciliation.
- 84/100
Landing Page
Dex
0 h1, 2 calls to action, 2 trust signals
Our screenshot service was rate limited by the CDN in front of this site, so the visual pass did not run. This is a limit on our vendor's shared addresses, not a setting on your store, and it often clears on a later run. Every HTML-level finding below is unaffected.
- No <h1> on the page. Both crawlers and AI agents use it as the page's primary claim.
- Not measured
Live Ads
Maya
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
- 0/100
AI Visibility
Maya
MeasuredChecked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 12 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
The 4 questions we asked
- “What are the best colognes?”
- “Best colognes for travel”
- “What are the best face moisturizers?”
- “Who makes the best candles?”
These questions were built from your own catalogue: product types, product titles, tags and your median price. None of them name your brand, so a mention means an assistant surfaced you unprompted.
Also recommended: Diptyque, Dior Sauvage, Creed Aventus, Tom Ford Oud Wood, CeraVe Moisturizing Cream, Olay Regenerist Micro-Sculpting Cream
- Glossier was not named in any of the 12 answers from 3 assistants. We asked "What are the best colognes?", "Best colognes for travel", "What are the best face moisturizers?", "Who makes the best candles?".
- The assistants named these instead: Diptyque, Dior Sauvage, Creed Aventus, Tom Ford Oud Wood, CeraVe Moisturizing Cream.
- perplexity could not be queried on this run, so it is excluded from the measurement rather than counted as a miss.
Agent Access
Dex
This report contains no revenue forecast, no spend recommendation and no dollar projection.
6 of 7 checks completed in 15.9s, served from a cached run.