Growth audit
Italic
italic.com
Run 31 July 2026, 1 day ago
What we measured
Four separate checks. There is no single overall score, because these measure different things and averaging them would hide which one needs work.
- Agent readability
- 73/100
- Tracking hygiene
- 65/100
- Landing page
- 72/100
- AI visibility
- 0/100
The headline
18 of your 88 product listings are still published and crawlable despite being unbuyable in every variant. An assistant that recommends one sends the shopper to a dead end.
What is costing you right now
- 18 of your 88 product listings (20%) cannot be bought in any size or variant, yet they are still published and crawlable. An assistant that recommends one sends the shopper to a dead end.
- Italic was not named in any of the 6 answers from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini when asked about bedding sets. Competitors like Crisp and OEKO-TEX were recommended instead, which means potential customers may not find your products through AI assistants.
Fix this week
- Remove or update the 18 dead listings to prevent AI assistants and customers from encountering unbuyable products.
How AI assistants see you
Checked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 6 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini did not mention Italic in any of the 6 answers when asked about bedding sets. Instead, they recommended competitors such as Crisp and OEKO-TEX. This indicates that Italic is not currently visible to AI assistants in this product category.
What we could not check
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
Want this report in your inbox?
Optional. Everything above stays on screen either way, and the link below works forever.
Every check, in full
- 73/100
AI Readiness
Dex
4 of 12 schema types present, llms.txt missing
- No BreadcrumbList on https://italic.com/products/down-comforter-down-pillow-sateen-bedding-bundle, so agents cannot place the product in your site hierarchy.
- schema logo returns HTTP 404, so it will not render
Paste-ready fixes (8)
WebSite schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebSite", "name": "Your Site Name", "url": "https://yoursite.com", "potentialAction": { "@type": "SearchAction", "target": "https://yoursite.com/search?q={search_term_string}", "query-input": "required name=search_term_string" } } </script>BreadcrumbList schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://yoursite.com" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Products", "item": "https://yoursite.com/products" } ] } </script>FAQPage schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Your question here?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Your answer here." } } ] } </script>Review schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "reviewRating": { "@type": "Rating", "ratingValue": "5", "bestRating": "5" }, "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Customer Name" }, "reviewBody": "Review text here" } </script>AggregateRating schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Product", "name": "Product Name", "aggregateRating": { "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": "4.5", "reviewCount": "127" } } </script>LocalBusiness schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "LocalBusiness", "name": "Your Business", "address": { "@type": "PostalAddress", "streetAddress": "123 Main St", "addressLocality": "City", "addressRegion": "State", "postalCode": "12345" }, "telephone": "+1-555-555-5555" } </script>HowTo schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "HowTo", "name": "How to do something", "step": [ { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 1", "text": "Do this first" }, { "@type": "HowToStep", "name": "Step 2", "text": "Then do this" } ] } </script>Article schema<script type="application/ld+json"> { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "Article Title", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Author Name" }, "datePublished": "2024-01-01", "image": "https://yoursite.com/article-image.jpg" } </script> - 65/100
Tracking & Pixels
Dex
0 of 3 pixels visible in page source, 5 issues
This check reads static HTML only. A GTM container is present (GTM-W8PLLVJ). Any pixel not listed as detected may still be firing through one of those, so we have not scored it as missing.
- Meta Pixel not visible in static HTML
- Google Ads / GA4 not visible in static HTML
- TikTok Pixel not visible in static HTML
- No consent management detected
- No tracking pixels detected on page
Catalogue
Parker
88 products, 1340 variants, 161 collections
Listed price range 14.4 to 1834, median 199 (store currency)
- 4 of 88 products have no image. AI shopping agents and Google Shopping both drop imageless items.
- 20 products have an empty product_type. Feed taxonomy falls back to guesswork downstream.
- 8 products carry no tags, so collection and filter logic cannot reach them.
- 18 of 88 product listings (20%) cannot be bought in any size or variant, yet they are still published and crawlable. An assistant that recommends one sends the shopper to a dead end.
- 66% of variants carry a compare-at price, so most of the catalogue reads as permanently discounted.
- 72/100
Landing Page
Dex
0 h1, 3 calls to action, 1 trust signals
- No <h1> on the page. Both crawlers and AI agents use it as the page's primary claim.
- The HTML document alone is 1882kb before any assets load.
From the visual pass
- Simplify the background to reduce visual clutter and improve focus on the headline.
- Increase the contrast of the navigation links for better readability.
- Ensure the call-to-action 'SHOP HAVANA' is more prominent and visually distinct.
- Not measured
Live Ads
Maya
Our connection to the Meta Ad Library did not return usable data on this run, so we could not read live ads. This is a gap in our measurement, not a finding about your advertising.
- 0/100
AI Visibility
Maya
MeasuredChecked chatgpt and claude and gemini across 6 answers. Not checked: perplexity.
- perplexity: not reached on this run
The 2 questions we asked
- “What are the best bedding sets?”
- “Best bedding sets under $110”
These questions came from your catalogue but it carried few descriptive signals, so they are broader than ideal.
Also recommended: Crisp, OEKO-TEX, Great, Silky, Good, Excellent
- Italic was not named in any of the 6 answers from 3 assistants. We asked "What are the best bedding sets?", "Best bedding sets under $110".
- The assistants named these instead: Crisp, OEKO-TEX, Great, Silky, Good.
- perplexity could not be queried on this run, so it is excluded from the measurement rather than counted as a miss.
Agent Access
Dex
This report contains no revenue forecast, no spend recommendation and no dollar projection.
6 of 7 checks completed in 16.5s, served from a cached run.