Chomps
Chomps scores 19 for AI visibility, named in 1 of 6 answers about its own category.
AI visibility
19
- Agent readability
- 92
- Tracking
- 71
- Landing page
- 88
Ranked on AI visibility alone. The other three are reported beside it and are not added together: they measure different things in different units.
Score over time
First measured 2026-08-02. A second run is needed before there is any movement to show, and each brand is re-measured about every three weeks.
What we asked
Generic category questions, used because this store's catalogue was not readable enough to build specific ones. None of them names the brand.
- 1What are the best snacks?
- 2Best snacks under $30
Who named them
| Assistant | Answered | Named Chomps |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 2 | 0 |
| Claude | 2 | 0 |
| Perplexity | Not reached on this run | - |
| Gemini | 2 | 1 |
Why I recommend it: Meat sticks are notoriously packed with hidden sugars and MSG, but Chomps is the gold standard for clean protein.
Coverage on this run
Measured 2026-08-02. 3 of 4 assistants responded, returning 6 answers across 8 question-and-assistant pairs. Every score on this page is scoped to those conditions, and a run that reaches too few assistants reports no score rather than a lower one.
Against its category
Chomps ranks 3 of 4 measured food brands. The category median is 29.
This page carries the ranking. The schema, tracking, catalogue and landing-page findings behind the other three scores are on the report itself.
See the full audit for this store